For my specific assignment, I was asked to travel north on Locust Street and find out why I couldn't continue on the street between Green and Springfield. This location was close enough to where I live (even though I had not seen this specific location before) that I dared to venture out into the frigid cold to find out what sort of road block was up. It was not quite what I expected. When I saw this...
Retention Basin: The retention pond/basin that is located between Green Street and Springfield Street
I was expecting some sort of concrete road block, or construction work, but instead i found a large, canyon like feature that had been fenced off. I looked around for some sort of sign or labeling to find out exactly what this was, and struggled to find such an identification at first. I took a lap around this fenced-off valley, and eventually found a sign labeled "Healy Street Retention Basin- established 1999". Here is a half camera image of the sign, which was buried behind a large wall of snow.
Healy Street Retention Basin
Now that I knew what it was, I had to figure out it's exact purpose. Turns out, the retention pond in this location is made in order to prevent flooding in Champaign, which this weekend proved valuable, as all of the snow that was previously blocking the sign (and snow all over Champaign) began to melt. This basin is linked to drains (as shown in the picture below) that help the flat land of Champaign stay dry by allowing the water to run into a lower level retention area.
Retention Drains
This is a great example to use for different types of Infrastructure. For example, the terrain of Champaign, along with the weather and geographical properties provide a good example of the EMBEDDED aspects of this infrastructure, or the non-technical parts.
It is also viewed as normally invisible, as most people pass by this retention pond, don't really wonder what it is, but simply view it as an inconvenience in there traveling. I myself had not noticed it before, and even people who I've talked to who live closer to it, and pass by it every day, have claimed they have sort of wondered what it was before, but never really put much thought into it.
This is also a good demonstration of durable technology, as retention ponds have been used for decades (even though this one has only been around since 1999). However, there are minimal switching costs if this retention basin was to be used by any other provider. The area is already there, and ready for use with drains in action, and as long as it is being used for the same purpose, there are not many switching costs that i could think of. I am no expert on the retention business, but besides buying the land, switching "providers" doesn't seem like much of an issue where severe changes need to be made.
Go to the top of this page.
your new career: wastewater engineer
By niftycThanks TheConnection,
I'm sorry for the delay in responding to your first post -- it is my fault. And I regret it, because I really enjoyed your post. Your clear exposition and the details of your investigation make wastewater retention basins seem novel and interesting. Good work with the scavenger hunt elements.
Two of the infrastructure features need some attention, though. This example of a switching cost is a little tricky as filling in the basin's land for a building would not mean switching between one provider of wastewater retention and another provider of wastewater retention. So this is not a good use of "switching cost". In comm tech terms your example is like giving up your cell phone contract and deciding to spend that money on going to the zoo. Have a look at the lecture examples of switching costs and you'll see what I mean, I bet.
Your description of "path dependent" is unfortunately not quite there. I'd avoid path dependence for your example unless you know a lot about wastewater engineering history (I do not!). Ideally, an example of path dependence would show that chance or minor events in the early history of a technology have consequences for its later evolution. It is also helpful to show that the connection between the two events is not necessarily logical, and that it could easily have gone another way. For instance, we learn to type the way we do on the QWERTY keyboard because over 100 years ago this guy Sholes decided it would sell more typewriters to be able to spell TYPEWRITER using only the top row of keys. Your example is not an example of path dependence -- you seem to say that basins evolved from drains (and is that even true? you have no source listed). So you are saying that this basin has a history... but everything has a history. Yet only some technologies are marked by a lot of path dependence. To put this in other words, your example of history does not show that a specific chance event in that history matters for the future evolution of the technology.
For this technology, path dependence was a very difficult feature to choose; if I were you I'd choose a different feature!
With these relatively minor revisions I'm confident that this post will receive a perfect score on this assignment. Overall, nice start! I'll look forward to your future work.
Christian